I am struck by the account in the Bible in the first chapter
of both Luke and Matthew where Zacharias is made speechless by the Angel
Gabriel for doubting that his aging and “barren” wife Elizabeth could be having
his child. Later on it mentions that
when the child is born, everyone is arguing about Elizabeth telling them his
name will be John. Nobody in the family
is named John and so they turn to Zacharias and ask him what the name should be
by ‘making gestures and signs.’
Now the first thing that comes to mind is why are they
making gestures and signs? Why didn’t
they just ask him? He’s not deaf, he is
without the ability to speak. Now I
suppose Gabriel maybe overdosed him a bit when he zapped him and took out his hearing ability as well, but I’m more inclined to think that it’s something
else. Some of these people at the
circumcision were possibly not locals or even relatives who had been around him for the last few months. They have a guy who can’t speak, and since
most deaf people don’t learn to speak (or speak clearly) they talk and ‘hear’ with
gestures. I have a lot of experience
with this since I have several deaf friends and my daughter is a deaf sign
interpreter. Most deaf people don’t speak out
loud a lot. So many people would be used
to a person who couldn’t speak ‘talking with gestures’ and would fall into the
trap of communicating with him that way.
It’s also possible that the signs and gestures were after he was asked
out loud, and he was trying to communicate the name to them with gestures, and
they wound up gesturing back until Zack finally gets frustrated and asks for a
piece of paper to write on.
It’s just one of the more interesting ‘inconsistencies’ that
non-believers like to point out when they are discounting the truth of the
Bible. One of the things I learned as a
police officer is that testimony is often inconsistent in little ways when it’s perfectly true…it’s actually one of the things that immediately made me suspect it was
truth. When things are identical it is
often because they are rehearsed fabrications by a group to sell a lie. Now, I’m not saying that gross inconsistency
is a sign of truth. However, little
inconsistencies can often be explained by circumstance, culture, point and time
of viewing and hearing an interaction, and so forth.
So take those curious little things in the Bible for what they are…more
proof that the account is accurate.
No comments:
Post a Comment